Abstracts

Below is a list of publications, with accompanying abstracts, authored or co-authored by members of Meyer & Associates, Inc. from 1980 to March 2008.

2005

Method Optimizes Frac Performance—B.R. Meyer, Author—The American Oil & Gas Reporter, December 2005.

A new solution methodology is available for the pseudosteady-state behavior of a well with a finite-conductivity vertical fracture based on a reservoir/fracture domain resistivity concept (SPE Paper 95941). It is easily implemented for fracture optimization by maximizing the productivity index for a given proppant mass (or volume).

This article presents a summary of the pseudosteady-state equations for finite-conductivity fractures in square formations, and focuses on fracture optimization based on the unified fracture design methodology of Prats and Economides. That is, for a given proppant volume and conductivity, there exists an optimum fracture conductivity and penetration that will maximize productivity.

Method Optimizes Frac Performance (PDF; 315 KB)

Pseudosteady-State Analysis of Finite Conductivity Vertical Fractures—B.R. Meyer, R.H. Jacot, Authors—SPE Paper 95941, Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2005, Dallas, Texas.

A novel solution methodology for pseudosteady-state behavior of a well with a finite-conductivity vertical fracture is formulated using a reservoir/fracture domain resistivity concept. The formulation encompasses a transformed resistivity domain based on an equivalent or effective wellbore radius. The resulting pseudosteady solution is presented in the form of the dimensionless productivity index, JD.

Some of the major advantages of this pseudosteady solution for finite-conductivity vertical fractures are:

  1. The methodology is based on fundamental principles,
  2. The solution is analytical and easily implemented,
  3. The equations are formulated for rectangular reservoirs,
  4. The model includes wellbore flow (i.e., wellbore radius effect) which is important for low-conductivity fractures, and
  5. The formulation accounts for a piecewise continuous linearly varying fracture conductivity including: proppant tail-ins, over-flushing, pinch zones, choked flow (internal), and external skin mechanisms.

The stimulation ratios for finite-conductivity fractures with an undamaged well are compared with those of McGuire and Sikora (1960), and Holditch (1974). The accuracy and validity of the pseudosteady model is also illustrated by comparison with the works of Prats (1961, 1962), Gringarten et al. (1974), Cinco-Ley et al. (1978, 1981), Barker and Ramey (1978), and Valko and Economides (1998).

A summary of the fundamental building blocks, effective wellbore radius concept, pseudo-skin functions and fracture skin are discussed. An improvement to Gringarten’s dimensionless productivity solution for infinite-conductivity vertical fractures in rectangular closed reservoirs is also presented.

2002

Modeling of Simultaneous Proppant Fracture Treatments in the Fruitland Coal and Pictured Cliffs Formations in the San Juan Basin—L.W. Bazan, S.D. Larkin, R.H. Jacot, B.R. Meyer, Authors—SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Lexington, Kentucky, October 23–26, 2002.

Limited entry design techniques have proven successful for the simultaneous fracture stimulation of the Fruitland Coal and the Pictured Cliffs sandstone in the T28N-R7W Federal Unit of the San Juan basin, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico. Optimization of this completion technique is dependent upon determining and placing the required effective propped fracture length in the coal and sandstone formations. This manuscript addresses utilizing limited entry techniques and a 3D fracture model. The model is then used to design N2 foam proppant fracture treatments in the coal and sandstone formations. This completion methodology allows reserves to be recovered from the Fruitland Coal at a significant cost reduction. With the different mechanical and reservoir properties of the two formation types, created fracture geometry will vary in each formation. Methods used to model these varied fracture geometries are discussed. Net pressure and production data analysis provide estimates for the effective propped fracture lengths in each formation. Radioactive tracer and production logs are presented as supporting evidence to validate the well completion design, the fracture modeling inputs and the stimulation of both formations simultaneously. Using this fracture modeling technology leads to increased reserve recovery and cost effective proppant fracture treatments.

2000

Impact of Stress-Dependent Young’s Modulus on Hydraulic Fracturing Modeling—B.R. Meyer, R.H. Jacot, Authors—38th U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, Washington D.C., July 7–10, 2000.

Hydraulic fracturing simulators currently assume that rocks are linear elastic materials with a linear stress-strain relationship. Although many formations do behave in a linear elastic manner when fractured, other soft rocks have been studied in triaxial and plane-strain compression tests that show a highly stress-dependent Young’s Modulus even at low strain levels. The fundamentals of the stress-strain relationship and the importance of distinguishing between the tangential and secant Young’s Modulus for hydraulic fracture designs are discussed. Various stress-strain models are presented for nonlinear elastic and elastic-plastic behaviors of materials. The first order impact of a stress-dependent Young’s modulus on the fracture geometry and pressure behavior is discussed. Various examples of stress-dependent Young’s Modulus are presented that illustrate the importance of including non-linear stress-strain behavior in hydraulic fracture modeling. Parametric studies of limiting non-linear behaviors using analytical 2D fracture propagation solutions and a numerical simulation results are also presented. Numerical hydraulic fracturing solutions for a stress-dependent Young’s modulus in soft rock fracturing are also discussed. General conditions identifying when non-linear elastic behavior should be included are also addressed.

The Effect of Fluid Loss During Fracture Calibration Tests on the Main Treatment—B.R. Meyer, R.H. Jacot, Authors—SPE Paper 65624, Eastern Regional Meeting, 2000, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Fracture calibration tests (minifracs) are very successful methods for providing estimates of the fluid efficiency, closure pressure, fracture geometry and leakoff coefficient prior to the main treatment. The pressure decline data is normally analyzed using a Nolte type method for calibration and redesign of the main treatment.

Many times it has been observed that the main treatment has a higher efficiency (less fluid loss) than the minifrac which can adversely impact the fracture treatment. This paper addresses the effect of fluid loss during fracture calibration tests on the main treatment.

An analytical method for leakoff controlled by the filter cake and/or filtrate fluid has been developed for analyzing the effect of fluid loss in the formation prior to the main treatment. The main treatment leakoff velocity and volume loss equations account for the effects of the minifrac fluid loss behavior, including filter cake, spurt loss, mobility, time of fracture creation and relative fracture planes.

This paper presents the foundation for a generalized set of equations quantifying the effects of the minifrac fluid loss on the main treatment by conservation of mass and Darcy’s law. Equations are formulated for the main treatment leakoff velocity and volume loss. Numerous figures are provided that illustrate the parametric effects of the minifrac fluid loss on the main treatment efficiency and fraction of pad volume.

Fracture Pressure Slope Analysis for TSO’s in High-Permeability Formations—J.E. Smith, B.R. Meyer, R.H. Jacot, Authors—SPE Paper 63174, Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2000, Dallas, Texas.

The relative popularity and success of the frac & pack technique in hydraulic fracturing has resulted in some misconceptions regarding the objective, procedure and pressure analysis after a screen-out. This paper addresses frac & pack procedures and the pressure response after a tip screen-out (TSO).

An analytical method has been developed for analyzing pressure slope behavior after a TSO in high permeability formations. These equations incorporate the first order parameters affecting the fracture pressure, rate of change of pressure (derivative) and pressure slope behaviors after a screen-out.

The fundamental equations for pressure slope analysis are similar to those originally developed by Nolte for pressure decline analysis. The major difference is that after the fracture stops propagating (i.e., after a TSO) the injection rate is not zero. Consequently, if the injection rate is greater than the leakoff rate, the fracture volume and net pressure (constant compliance) must increase. If the injection rate falls below the leakoff rate, the fracture net pressure must decrease.

Although analytical equations will not replace three dimensional fracturing simulators normally used for design and real-time history matching, they do provide insight into the major parameters affecting pressure behavior after a TSO without running a numerical simulator. The analytical equations presented in this paper demonstrate why pressure slopes after a screen-out are typically much greater than unity for low efficiency fractures.

A generalized set of equations is presented for analyzing the pressure slope behavior after a screen-out. Numerous graphs are provided which illustrate the parametric effects of fracture efficiency, spurt loss and fracture net pressure at the time of a screen-out on the pressure, derivative and slop behaviors after a TSO. Comparisons of the analytical pressure slope equations with a three dimensional fracturing simulator are presented to show the application of the analysis.

A new methodology of frac & pack post analysis is presented using the pressure slope technique. This methodology utilizes the pressure slope during a screen-out as a check on the minifrac and fracture efficiency. Two frac & pack cases with bottomhole data are analyzed using a three dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulator to illustrate the pressure slope analysis for low efficiency fractures.

Implementation of Fracture Calibration Equations for Pressure Dependent Leakoff—B.R. Meyer, R.H. Jacot, Authors—SPE Paper 62545, Western Regional Meeting, 2000, Long Beach, California.

Nolte originally developed a pressure decline analysis method to provide an estimate of the fluid efficiency, closure pressure, fracture geometry and leakoff coefficient. The Nolte method of pressure decline analysis has become a standard for fracture calibration in the industry. Implementation of a proper calibration test is critical for the successful design and evaluation of hydraulic fracturing treatments.

Although Nolte’s original work has many simplifying assumptions regarding fracture closure (e.g., constant leakoff coefficient, no spurt, no fracture growth after shut-in, constant compliance, etc.) it still provides the foundation for the basic first order parameters affecting pressure decline behavior.

The assumption of pressure independent fluid loss may have an adverse affect on the pressure decline analysis if leakoff is controlled by the filtrate viscosity and/or reservoir compressibility and mobility effects or fissure opening effects. An improved procedure is presented for identifying and implementing pressure dependent leakoff. This methodology is formulated from the generalized Nolte G function approach utilizing a dimensionless pressure function based on the original work of Castillo for a pressure dependent leakoff coefficient and Barree for naturally fractured reservoirs. The procedure first makes use of the standard Nolte analysis to identify the presence of pressure dependent leakoff, and then establishes the appropriate leakoff pressure dependent parameters by matching the pressure decline behavior. Deviation of the measured data from the dimensionless pressure function versus Nolte G time indicates closure. The methodology also utilizes the first derivative and pressure superposition derivative to help identify and quantify closure.

Guidelines are presented to identify cases where pressure dependent leakoff should be considered. Implications of neglecting pressure dependent leakoff or using a pressure dependent leakoff coefficient improperly are addressed. The governing equations and field examples are presented for clarity.

1999

Identifying Fracture Geometry in the Appalachian Basin—R.H. Jacot, B.R. Meyer, R.R. Myers, Authors—SPE Paper 57434, Eastern Regional Meeting, 1999, Charleston, West Virginia.

Identification of fracture geometry is necessary for the proper design and execution of a hydraulic fracture treatment. The Appalachian Basin consists of many different producing formations. These formations can vary in depth from 600 ft. to 7700 ft. Because of the low reservoir pressure (many of these formations are also underpressured) and low permeability, most of these formations require a hydraulic fracturing treatment to be economically successful.

1996

TSOs, Frac Packs Boost Productivity—B.R. Meyer, P.J. Hudson, C.T. Wooten, Authors—The American Oil & Gas Reporter, April 1996.

Tip screen-out (TSO) and frac pack designs have gained popularity in the industry, especially in high-permeability wells in the Gulf of Mexico where inadequate conductivity and formation damage have traditionally been problems.

TSOs and frac packs are generally performed in moderate- to high-permeability reservoirs that require greater conductivities than conventional hydraulic fracturing. The implementation of TSOs and frac packs over the past few years has resulted in substantially greater fracture conductivities and improved proppant placement. Fundamentally, these techniques are similar up to the step of fully packing a fracture.

TSO methodology as presented in “Tip Screen-Out Fracturing: A Technique for Soft Unstable Formations” by M.B. Smith, W.K. Miller and J. Haga and applied to the Ravenspurn South natural gas field is used to deliberately create a proppant screen-out or bridging condition around the perimeter of the fracture to prevent further propagation and height growth. Continued pumping results in “ballooning” or an increase in the fracture aperture with continued increasing fracture pressure. The increased aperture results in a greater propped width and increased fracture conductivity. Typically, only the perimeter of the fracture is packed.

Frac packs differ from TSOs by packing the entire fracture with proppant from the tip to the well bore at the settled bank concentration, which greatly increases fracture conductivity. This technique is typically performed in higher-permeability formations that require large average conductivities to increase productivity.

The relative popularity and success of the frac pack technique for hydraulic fracturing has resulted in many misconceptions regarding the objectives and procedures used for these non-conventional treatments. The frac pack methodology presented here (and compared to the classical TSO methodology) was originally developed and implemented into a three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulator (MFrac-IITM version 7.1). An analytical form of this methodology was presented at the 1995 annual meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.

1993

Integrating Wireline Data With Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Fracture Simulators in the Spraberry Trend—R.E. Barba Jr., B.R. Meyer, Authors—SPE Paper 25509, Production Operations Symposium, March 1993, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Two-dimensional hydraulic fracture simulators are used to design the majority of hydraulic fracture treatments in West Texas. These models assume a fixed hydraulic fracture height. In many cases, hydraulic fracture treatments often do not stay confined within a fixed height as the two dimensional models assume. In the Spraberry/Dean siltstones of West Texas there are no strong barriers to vertical fracture migration, and two dimensional models are clearly inappropriate. Three dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulators overcome this limitation of a fixed height by calculating the fracture height. The inputs required are considerably more involved, and the 3D models require data from both the pay sand and boundary layers. If the raw input data are not available or if sufficient engineering effort is not invested the model output may be misleading. Wireline logs can provide valuable inputs to these three dimensional simulators. These inputs will be discussed, along with case studies where the inputs helped optimize the completion design.

1992

Utilizing Mini-Frac Data to Improve Design & Production—M.W. Hagel, B.R. Meyer, Authors—CIM Paper 92-40, 43rd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, June, 1992, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (JCPT March 1994, Volume 33, No. 3).

An extension to the current mini-frac procedure is presented to improve the quality of the analysis. The methodology is based on history matching the pressure response during pumping and closure for the mini-frac treatment. This process couples the traditional mini-frac analysis with a three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulator.

The fracture propagation solution for geometry and extension pressure is coupled with the post injection pressure decline analysis. The coupling process reduces the possible number of parameter uncertainties.

The measured fracture extension and decline pressure data is used to establish the appropriate fracture geometry model and to perform parametric studies. Reservoir and fluid parameters are then varied to perform further sensitivity analyses.

Repeating the procedure for a multi-cycle mini-frac operation provides the analyst with an opportunity to refine the parametric analyses and select the most probably set of parameters to optimize the treatment. This results in an improved understanding of hydraulic fracture propagation and formation response, which results in a higher probability for further improving production.

The fracture-pressure analysis and procedures provided in this paper generally follow the theory of mini-frac analysis originally formulated by Nolte. An important difference, however, is that the pressure-analysis used here couples a mini-frac simulator with a three-dimensional hydraulic fracture simulator to predict fracture propagation and pressure response. The mini- frac simulator is first used for preliminary analysis and quick estimates of parameters prior to performing more rigorous parametric studies with the 3D fracturing model.

Parametric studies and field case examples are presented to illustrate the improved mini-frac/ treatment techniques. Simulated values for permeability and fracture height are then compared to more traditional sources of information from lab analysis and logs.

1990

Real-Time 3D Hydraulic Fracturing Simulation: Theory and Field Case Studies—B.R. Meyer, G.D. Cooper, S.G. Nelson, Authors—SPE Paper 19329, 65th Annual Technical Conference, 1990, New Orleans, LA.

This paper presents a foundation and methodology for real time three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulation and analysis. The equations governing fracture propagation are summarized for both rate and net pressure boundary conditions. A new dimensionless pressure slope parameter is introduced which prevents using chaotic measured or calculated pressures. This parameter also helps identify near wellbore restrictions.

The real time fracturing simulator utilizes the same numerical modules and routines as the design program. This will insure design, real time and post-design simulation compatibility. Simulated results for the rate and net pressure driven models can be displayed concurrently during the hydraulic stimulation.

Comparative studies of the rate and net pressure driven numerical results are included. A post-treatment analysis of a real time field case study is presented to illustrate the application of this real time fracturing system. The importance of using a dimensionless pressure slope is also discussed.

1989

Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Fracturing Simulation on Personal Computers: Theory and Comparison Studies—B.R. Meyer, Author—SPE Paper 19329, Eastern Regional SPE Meeting, 1989, Morgantown, West Virginia.

The solution methodology of a three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulator (MFRAC-II) for use on personal computers is described. The Simulator is design oriented and user-friendly with menu-driven pre- and post-processors. It has been formulated and structured to be used as an everyday design tool.

The coupled rock and fluid mechanics equations governing fracture propagation are presented. These non-linear partial differential equations are then transformed and solved using integral methods. The criteria for fracture propagation and the effect fracture toughness and confining stress contrast has on fracture propagation are also discussed.

Comparative studies with full 3D hydraulic fracturing simulators are included to illustrate the diversity of MFRAC-II. These comparison studies range from fractures dominated by pure rock mechanics (fracture toughness) to fractures dominated by viscous driven fluids. The fractures range from highly uncontained to very well contained fractures.

1988

Simulated Mini-Frac Analysis—B.R. Meyer, M.W. Hagel, Authors—CIM Paper, 88-39-90, 39th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, June 1988, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

A new mini-frac methodology is presented for the automated simulation of mini-frac analysis. The solution is based on solving the governing momentum, mass conservation and constitutive relationships for Perkins-Kern/Nordgren (PKN), Geertsma-Deklerk (GDK) and penny shape type fracture geometries.

The analytical technique is unique because the fracture propagation characteristics of length, width, pressure and efficiency are numerically calculated from conservation of momentum and mass principles for power-law type fluids.

Major enhancements to current mini-frac analysis include:

  1. momentum and mass conservation
  2. spurt loss
  3. fluid flow-back after pumping
  4. time-dependent fluid loss coefficients
  5. interference closure
  6. determination of formation permeability.

The analysis has the additional advantage of using the measured pressure decline data as a history matching parameter to determine the appropriate fracture model and sensitivity of input data.

A number of mini-frac designs, parametric studies and filed case examples are presented to illustrate the applicability of the numerical technique.

1987

Heat Transfer in Hydraulic Fracturing—B.R. Meyer, Author—SPE Paper 17041, SPE Production Engineering Journal, November 1989.

An analytical heat transfer model is presented for the combined convection along a vertical fracture with conduction and convection in the reservoir. The model couples the energy (heat transfer) and fracture propagation equations resulting in a closed form integral dimensionless temperature solution.

Major Model enhancements include incorporation of the following mechanisms:

  1. a finite film coefficient
  2. time-dependent fracture temperature for calculating the instantaneous heat flux
  3. energy storage in the fracture
  4. coupled energy and fracture propagation equations.

The introduction of a power-law Nusselt number to determine the convection film coefficient is also new and unique.

The influence of fluid leakoff and a finite convection film coefficient as heat reduction mechanisms is discussed. The effect of energy storage and a time-dependent fracture temperature on the heat transfer rate is also illustrated. Finally, simulations studies illustrating the effect of heat transfer on fracture propagation characteristics are presented.

1986

Generalized Drag Coefficient Applicable for All Flow Regimes—B.R. Meyer, Author—Oil and Gas Journal, May 26, 1986.

A generalized drag coefficient correlation for particulate settling in power-law-type fluids is applicable for all flow regimes from Stokes’ (laminar) to Newton’s flow (turbulence).

The major advantage of this correlation for hydrocarbon reservoirs is that it correctly asymptotes to a modified Stokes’ law (viscous effects) at low Reynolds vale (Re) numbers and to the turbulent drag coefficient CD ≈ 0.44 at large values of Re (inertia dominance).

The use of Stokes’ law can greatly underestimate the drag coefficient and grossly overestimate the terminal settling velocity at large Re.

In many respects, this article is a review and extension of drag coefficient correlations used in hydraulic fracturing on particulate settling in Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.

Since most non-Newtonian correlations are for creeping flow (Re′ < 0.1), the major emphasis will be to extend these correlations to Newton’s flow.

A comparison with experimental data and empirical correlations of other investigators is included to verify the validity and applicability of the extended correlation.

Design Formulae for 2D and 3D Vertical Hydraulic Fractures: Model Comparison and Parametric Studies—B.R. Meyer, Author—SPE Paper 15240, SPE Unconventional Gas Technology Symposium, May 1986.

This paper presents asymptotic analytical and numerical solutions for two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) type hydraulic fracture geometries. The fracture propagation models investigated include: a Geertsma-Deklerk (GDK), Perkins-Kern/Nordgren (PKN) and a 3D type model.

Comprehensive 2D and 3D design formulae for power-law fracturing fluids are given for various cases of fluid loss and containment. These formulae can be used to benchmark 2D and 3D hydraulic fracturing simulators. Characteristics of equilibrium 3D height growth are also discussed. Parametric studies based on the design formulae are performed to show the effect of any one variable.

Typical fracture designs are simulated for various containment and leakoff examples using each of the fracture propagation models, along with a comparison of proppant scheduling and design. The simulation studies identify and illustrate the basic characteristics and design differences of each model.

1985

Preliminary Study of Champagne-Effect Modeling: Fundamental Aspects of Gas Liquid Flow—H.J. Sneck, P.A. Thompson, B.R. Meyer, Authors—ASME Winter Meeting, November 1985.


Frac Model in 3D, Four Part Series—B.R. Meyer, Author—Oil and Gas Journal, June–July, 1985.

A new three-dimensional, hydraulic fracturing simulator (MFRAC-II) is introduced in this first of a four-part series of articles. Design-oriented and user-friendly, it has been structured and formulated to be used as an everyday design tool.

Subsequent installments will include proppant transport, confining stress, variable injection rates, fracture closure, and post-fracture production simulation.

Menu-driven, pre and post-processor modules are included to facilitate ease of data input and graphical display of numerical results. The simulator is written in standard Fortran 77 for use on a personal computer as well as mini/main frames. Typical execution time on a PC is on the order of minutes.

1981

Mass Transfer in Buoyancy-Driven Multi-Phase Dissolution Flows—B.R. Meyer, Author, Ph.D. Thesis, September 1981.

Analytical models have been developed to calculate steady and unsteady one-dimensional nonhomogeneous multiphase dissolution flows in variable area inclined channels. The models are based on conservation of mass and momentum of each of the phases for a liquid containing dissolved gas which tends to come out of solution in a supersaturated pressure field.

The steady state system of nonlinear initial value differential equations is solved numerically by an iterative variable step-size predictor-corrector algorithm for the pressure, void fraction and velocity profiles. This method incorporates the capability of predicting choked flow. The method of calculating transient multiphase flow is presented based on a modified implicit multifield (IMF) method for the field variables using a drift-flux model. The unsteady numerical finite difference method incorporates the flexibility for variable advanced timing of convective terms from a fully implicit to purely explicit form. The method has the capability of treating the mass phases fully implicitly. This numerical method incorporates spatial coupling of pressure and incremental pressure terms which results in order-of-magnitude gains in computation time.

Steady and unsteady numerical calculations are presented to demonstrate the numerical validity and accuracy of each code for a wide range of multiphase steady and transient dissolution flows. These problems include the numerical calculation of steady full dissolution and single-phase flows and unsteady calculations of pressure pulse propagation, blowout phenomena, flow oscillation and asymptotic behavior.

The immediate application of the present work was to analyze multiphase dissolution flows for compressed air energy storage (CAES) systems. The steady-state numerical results are summarized as a parametric study of the effect mass transfer and system parameters have on pressure, void fraction and velocity profiles for the RPI high solubility carbon dioxide-water system. A comparison of numerically predicted and RPI experimental results is provided. The unsteady analysis is performed for a typical CAES start-up transient to demonstrate the dynamic system response of multiphase flows. The resulting time-dependent pressure, void fraction and velocity profiles are reported at various nodal positions.

1980

Buoyancy-Driven Dissolution Flows—B.R. Meyer, P.A. Thompson, Authors—American Physical Society of Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1980, Ithaca, New York


Combined Convection and Radiation in Tube Flow of an Absorbing, Emitting and Anistropically Scattering Gas-Particulate Suspension—M.F. Modest, B.R. Meyer, F.H. Azad, Authors—presented at the ASME/AICHE National Heat Transfer Conference, 1980, Orlando, Florida.


Home | Products | Documentation | Technical Support | Training | Abstracts | Contact Us